wilderthan: ((Dr Horrible) Status quo)
Two Ian Rankin reviews -- Tooth and Nail, Strip Jack )

Wild Seed (Octavia Butler)

This book wasn't as good a match for my mood as N.K. Jemisin's The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, but it didn't suffer for being read immediately after it. It's an interesting concept: a being that might as well be a god, moving from body to body, amoral and utterly self-serving, trying to breed others like him so he won't be alone, and a being who is also immortal, or close to it, nurturing families so she won't be alone. The two of them are entirely different: Anwanyu loves the people she finds and treats them well, no matter what, and she has children and cares for them not as means to an end, but as ends in themselves. Doro is merciless, regarding people only as long as they serve his purpose. We're clearly meant to sympathise with Anwanyu, as she's the closest to what we can understand, but Doro has his moments too, at least for me. His loneliness is something I can understand.

The different abilities, and the difficulty in producing them, in people surviving them, and how many ways they can go wrong, rings true to me. It's discomforting to read about people being bred like cattle, without real dignity, but sometimes you kind of share in Doro's frustration that it isn't turning out the way it should.

Because of the immortal nature of the two characters, they're the only ones that exist throughout the novel, but there are one or two others worth sympathising with, mostly (for me) Isaac and Thomas, despite how short-lived Thomas is.

The style of the writing is deceptively simple, but there's a lot to think about. It isn't mindless brain candy, despite being easy to read.

The most unsatisfying thing about it is the ending. I'm aware this is the first book in its timeline, not the only book, but the end is an uncomfortable compromise that leaves Anwanyu still not quite doing what she feels is right, which is a disappointment.

The Haunting of Hill House (Shirley Jackson)

I'm glad I didn't read The Haunting of Hill House while alone in my flat, which I was unreasonably scared by as it was! It's a creepy story, though it leaves it open to interpretation whether it's all caused by psychological breakdown or by actual malevolent spirits in the house. The creep factor is done quite well, I think. There's enough tension to make it feel unsettling, but things aren't described so clearly that they lose the element of imagination that makes them powerful -- when something is described clearly, the reader can't put their own interpretation on it, can't imagine what would be most frightening to them. When it's left to the imagination in places, like this, you can imagine whatever is most frightening to you... What is frightening to me might seem ridiculous to you, after all.

The characters are, at first, likeable enough: I like Eleanor's dreaminess, and I like her imagined little stories. I liked the banter, at first, and how all of them later developed tensions, little bitchinesses... The way they relate to each other feels realistic for the circumstances. By the end, I'm not sure I like anyone very much, but I found that -- in this case -- interesting, rather than repellent.

It's definitely interesting to read this having already read other things obviously influenced by it -- Sarah Waters' The Little Stranger, for example. It's a resonant sort of story: people seem to want to make their own version.
wilderthan: ((Books) Stack)
Hide and Seek (Ian Rankin)

I've read this one before, but my memories of it were so hazy that I wasn't surprised by anything, but I didn't remember much before I read it, either. It isn't really very memorable, and Rebus as a character is less interesting than in the first book, bouncing around from hangover to hangover without even interesting blackouts to dignify himself with. I find it hard to understand how the brains of the Marlowes and Rebuses of crime fiction aren't rotted away to nothing by all the alcohol... Tartan noir, indeed.

It's entertaining enough, particularly if you like the strongly Scottish flavour or want to follow Rebus further. I'm planning to read (or reread) all of the Rebus books, because I never finished them before, and I'm told they get very, very good. Besides, I like to read all of a series, once I've started.

Clouds of Witness (Dorothy L. Sayers)

I do like Lord Peter. I was surprised at how little of him there was in this one, considering the family connection. In the first book, there were hints at his PTSD and such, but I didn't feel like the narrative of this book was as close to him. He wasn't so annoying, either, in his speech or attitude: part of that was probably knowing what to expect, of course, but still, it all felt somewhat toned down in this one, and not much by way of overarching plot seemed to happen -- I'm told it will, later on; I'm just eagerly watching out for it.

This one's a good mystery. Plenty of red herrings to keep one occupied, but not so difficult that it doesn't come straight near the end. Some things I got ahead of time, too, but not everything, which nicely balances the need to feel clever with the need for mystery to keep one reading.

The scenes/transcripts from court got perhaps a little too long-winded, but for the most part I found it nicely paced and easy to read.

Definitely a fun one.

Unnatural Death (Dorothy L. Sayers)

Still not seeing much of Lord Peter as a character, to date. In fact, looking back over it, this book didn't really spend much time with him at all, at least not much time of any consequence -- even less than in Clouds of Witness, though there was, of course, a family connection there. It doesn't seem strongly tied to the other books: there's little reference to Peter Wimsey's family, or Parker's interest in Lady Mary, or such things. I could have wished for more of Bunter, too. I'm not sure if it's my interest in the characters making me expect them to be included more, or whether there's genuinely less of them.

It's an interesting little mystery, anyway, and I probably wouldn't have figured out the cause of death if I hadn't seen a similar scenario in NCIS a couple of days ago. A lot of the mystery in this is in figuring out how it was done. Again, there was a nice sense of me being able to figure things out, with enough mystery left behind that I needed to keep reading.

Fun to read, like the others.

The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club (Dorothy L. Sayers)

I figured this one out far too quickly, before I was even half-way through reading it. That made it just a little tiresome, especially as it isn't very plotty in any over-arching way. I do love Lord Peter as a character, though -- initially I didn't, for much the same reasons as I do now: his manner, his way of talking... He lightens it, in some ways. I wish there was more of Bunter, really, more than ever. He did very little in this book.

One thing I did like was the characters we get introduced to, in this book: Sheila Fentiman for one, with her devotion to her husband, and I really rather liked the Dorland girl when we actually got to know her a little. I was glad for the chance of a happy end for her, really.

Fun in its way, but I figured the mystery out too fast, which made some parts drag rather. I hope the more character-driven stuff comes soon...
wilderthan: ((Dr Horrible) Status quo)
I read a couple of Ian Rankin's books a while ago, probably three or four years ago now. This one hadn't faded entirely out of memory, so I didn't find anything too surprising about it. Ian Rankin's own observations about it, in the introduction, about how obviously it's a first novel and how inexperienced he was, are true. It shows sometimes, not that I think it's necessarily bad writing -- just, Ian Rankin is still finding his feet in this book. I might actually have enjoyed it more if I hadn't known the plot mostly already, if things had been more surprising to me.

His writing is nicely atmospheric. There's a sense of foggy days and wet days and Scotland about it. The characters and such are okay: the relationship with Gill Templer isn't done terribly, even if it doesn't particularly fire me with enthusiasm. Rebus himself is at times pitiable rather than sympathetic, I think, partly because the plot is all about how he's broken and things that are very personal to him and the narrative tries to sneak that hint of doubt into you about his connection to the murders. He doesn't seem like a nice guy or a terrible one, just a guy getting by -- I didn't love or hate him.

I'm pleased enough with the results of rereading this one that I'm going to read the rest of the Rebus books, sometime soon.

Profile

wilderthan: (Default)
Eden

October 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 1011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags