wilderthan: ((Dr Horrible) Status quo)
[personal profile] wilderthan
It took me a long time to read David Copperfield -- because I stalled in the middle for... well, about three months. It's hard for me to review it as a whole, in that light. I remember reading it when I was younger quite vividly, but I'm not sure I ever got past the first few chapters, back then. It's contrived to get tangled up in my mind with Great Expectations, somehow.

It's interesting to know that this book is thought to be based largely on Dickens' own life. I don't know if he ever said that himself, or whether it was deduced by other people. If he did look on David as himself, it's a wonder he wrote about him so frankly. It certainly seems like a lifetime's worth of Dickens' experience went into creating it, anyway.

I liked it a lot, despite the length and Dickens' tendency to go on a bit. I felt sorry for David a lot, and sometimes wanted to slap him -- which is the way I feel about some of my favourite characters, and shouldn't make you think I didn't like him.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-04 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samuraiter.livejournal.com
Dickens frequently has a character who represents his point of view on a subject (i.e. Nicholas Nickleby), but the fact that David is represented as a three-dimensional character is what suggests to most critics that he is meant to be Dickens as a whole person.


wilderthan: (Default)

October 2013

6789 1011 12

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags